<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMENDED GOOGLE BOOKS SETTLEMENT IS A “PALTRY PROPOSAL” THAT DEFIES ANTITRUST LAWS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbookalliance.org/2010/01/amended-google-books-settlement-is-a-%e2%80%9cpaltry-proposal%e2%80%9d-that-defies-antitrust-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2010/01/amended-google-books-settlement-is-a-%e2%80%9cpaltry-proposal%e2%80%9d-that-defies-antitrust-laws/</link>
	<description>Open Book Alliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:39:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Nopeman</title>
		<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2010/01/amended-google-books-settlement-is-a-%e2%80%9cpaltry-proposal%e2%80%9d-that-defies-antitrust-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-10013</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Nopeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 11:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbookalliance.org/?p=634#comment-10013</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Давно искал такой ответ...&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://supkadry.ru? http://rel&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt; .All [.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Давно искал такой ответ&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://supkadry.ru? <a href="http://rel" rel="nofollow">http://rel</a>&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;>  .All [&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Nopeman</title>
		<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2010/01/amended-google-books-settlement-is-a-%e2%80%9cpaltry-proposal%e2%80%9d-that-defies-antitrust-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-10009</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Nopeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbookalliance.org/?p=634#comment-10009</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Почему бы и нет?...&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://hr-moscow-crew.ru/? http://rel&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt; and Google, Inc.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Почему бы и нет?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://hr-moscow-crew.ru/? <a href="http://rel" rel="nofollow">http://rel</a>&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;>  and Google, Inc&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Nopeman</title>
		<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2010/01/amended-google-books-settlement-is-a-%e2%80%9cpaltry-proposal%e2%80%9d-that-defies-antitrust-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-9989</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Nopeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbookalliance.org/?p=634#comment-9989</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Рульно!...&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://hr-moscow-crew.ru/? http://rel&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &lt;/a&gt; The Open Book Alliance today formally filed Amicus Curiae in opposition to the proposed settlement between the Authors Guild, Inc.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Рульно!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://hr-moscow-crew.ru/? <a href="http://rel" rel="nofollow">http://rel</a>&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;>  The Open Book Alliance today formally filed Amicus Curiae in opposition to the proposed settlement between the Authors Guild, Inc&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
