On Tuesday, three national library associations sent a letter to the Department of Justice expressing their concern over Google’s pricing power should the GBS be approved.
In their opinion, entrusting a single entity with the exclusive rights to digitized books would, “make libraries particularly vulnerable to profit maximizing pricing.”
The group had previously expressed these concerns in a July 2009 letter, writing:
In the absence of competition for the services it will enable, the settlement could compromise fundamental library values such as equity of access to information, patron privacy, and intellectual freedom.
Tuesday’s letter reminds the DOJ that the revised settlement in no way solved this critical flaw.
Beyond the lack of competition codified by the GBS, the American Library Association, Association of Research Libraries and Association of Research Libraries continue to decry a lack of academic representatives on the proposed book registry.
Not surprisingly, they find it unacceptable that the folks who contribute “most of the books Google will scan and display” don’t get a say in overseeing this invaluable collection.
The mass digitization of books promises to bring tremendous value to consumers, libraries, scholars, and students. The Open Book Alliance will work to advance and protect this promise. And, by...
More
Leave a reply