<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fundamental Flaws of the Google Book Settlement: How Will Google Address These?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbookalliance.org/2009/10/fundamental-flaws-of-the-google-book-settlement-how-will-google-address-these/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2009/10/fundamental-flaws-of-the-google-book-settlement-how-will-google-address-these/</link>
	<description>Open Book Alliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:38:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Open Book Alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2009/10/fundamental-flaws-of-the-google-book-settlement-how-will-google-address-these/comment-page-1/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Book Alliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbookalliance.org/?p=388#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>[...] the question remains the same — will Google and its partners seriously address the numerous fundamental flaws in the settlement found by the DoJ and others?  The Open Book Alliance eagerly awaits the answer to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the question remains the same — will Google and its partners seriously address the numerous fundamental flaws in the settlement found by the DoJ and others?  The Open Book Alliance eagerly awaits the answer to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Book Alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2009/10/fundamental-flaws-of-the-google-book-settlement-how-will-google-address-these/comment-page-1/#comment-2628</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Book Alliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbookalliance.org/?p=388#comment-2628</guid>
		<description>[...] know how much Google and its partners want to push a settlement through. Yet, the Department of Justice found fundamental flaws in the original settlement, saying, “As presently drafted, the Proposed Settlement does not meet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know how much Google and its partners want to push a settlement through. Yet, the Department of Justice found fundamental flaws in the original settlement, saying, “As presently drafted, the Proposed Settlement does not meet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Book Alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2009/10/fundamental-flaws-of-the-google-book-settlement-how-will-google-address-these/comment-page-1/#comment-1484</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Book Alliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbookalliance.org/?p=388#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>[...] is clearly the wrong way. This is not just us and hundreds of other groups saying this; the Department of Justice has made it clear that the settlement does not pass [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is clearly the wrong way. This is not just us and hundreds of other groups saying this; the Department of Justice has made it clear that the settlement does not pass [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
