<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victory for the Public Interest &#8211; New Process Must Be Open + Transparent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openbookalliance.org/2009/09/victory-for-the-public-interest-new-process-must-be-open-transparent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2009/09/victory-for-the-public-interest-new-process-must-be-open-transparent/</link>
	<description>Open Book Alliance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:39:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Open Book Alliance</title>
		<link>http://www.openbookalliance.org/2009/09/victory-for-the-public-interest-new-process-must-be-open-transparent/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Book Alliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbookalliance.org/?p=358#comment-964</guid>
		<description>[...] flaws with the proposed Google Book Settlement. As acknowledged by Google and its partners, the original settlement is now dead; their request to postpone the October 7th fairness hearing was granted by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] flaws with the proposed Google Book Settlement. As acknowledged by Google and its partners, the original settlement is now dead; their request to postpone the October 7th fairness hearing was granted by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
