Today’s Reading…

Library Journal has a nice summary of the DoJ’s filing here, which summarizes the myriad of objections and concerns addressed in the brief. Library Journal also posted an editorial in which they question the wisdom of giving Google exclusive control over the world’s books. From the editorial:

“It is clearly not in the best interest of libraries or the various publics they serve. We call on Judge Chin (and, as [Marybeth] Peters does, on Congress) to throw out the settlement—or at the very least modify and supervise its most pernicious sections—to ensure that the future of digital books, many scanned from libraries that purchased them at significant cost, not be put in the exclusive hands of Google.”

Pamela Samuelson, of UC Berkeley, one of the most influential and knowledgeable voices in this debate, also weighted in with a column in the Huffington Post. 

  • It is filed under: Uncategorized
  • Tags:

Leave a reply


Learn more…

Connect and Follow

Mission

The mass digitization of books promises to bring tremendous value to consumers, libraries, scholars, and students. The Open Book Alliance will work to advance and protect this promise. And, by...

More

What Experts Are Saying About the Settlement…

Important Dates

December 14, 2009
Notice begins

January 28, 2010
Deadline for authors to opt out of the settlement

January 28, 2010
Deadline to file objections and/or amicus briefs

February 4, 2010
Deadline to file notice of intent to appear at Fairness Hearing

February 4, 2010
DOJ response

February 11, 2010
Plaintiffs move for final approval

February 18, 2010
Final Fairness Hearing

March 31, 2011
Deadline to claim Books and Inserts

Archives